Home » Blog Assignment
Category Archives: Blog Assignment
Timothy Morton Dark Ecology and Oryx & Crake
Chapter 8 in Oryx and Crake goes back in to Jimmy’s memories. It starts out by Jimmy having a difficult time accepting the fact that his father is going to marry someone else. Jimmy sees that something he has to deal with and Crake comforts him throughout these years. They both start to graduate from high school and going on to their respective schools. Throughout Jimmy going to Martha Graham Academy and Crake going to Watson-Crick institute they were separated. While Jimmy attended Martha Graham he started to date women and help them with any problems they had and would build many relationships with many different women. Eventually he would tell them his stories about his troubled life and they would comfort him. They were well aware of the story about his mother, which became a repetitive story for him to share with the girls and serve as pity in him. The girl who had not fallen in to this tap was Oryx. She didn’t because of the way she was brought up and disturbed past. Jimmy goes to visit Crake at Watson-Crick institute and learns much about science and was amazed how the school treated their students. During the visit Jimmy finds out that Crake was part of a group called Madd Addam, which is a radical group that uses science against pharmaceutical companies through various attacks. Jimmy became very uncomfortable and concerned about Crake’s affiliation with the group. Snowman remembers that Crake’s reoccurring nightmares and Crake stated that he could not remember anything in the morning. Jimmy suspects that he is living in Crake’s nightmare.
Snowman now is on his hike and discovers shops that are completely empty; plants growing through the cracks of the buildings, and all visible traces of human habitation are gone. He contemplates the possibility that he is not the only human alive. Snowman spends most of his time remembering the hints that Crake gave him. He remembers an argument he had with Crake, which Crake had asked Jimmy to imagine the world if civilization was destroyed. He feels responsible for not having knowing or seeing the pieces of information in time to have prevented what happened so he blames himself. Snowman’s guilt is mixed with the physical remains of death and destruction that he has to walk through in order to reach RejoovenEsense. The loss of hope that he sees in rotting corpses and abandoned houses is a reminder of what he did not suffer. As he keeps walking he looks and sees in front of him large houses, shopping malls, and clinics for his primarily in search for food. He chooses a random home and enters in a broken window. He finds the remains of a man in the bathroom and a woman lying in the king sized bed. He stops to look at himself in the mirror and he sees a complete stranger looking back at him. The woman in the bed reminds Snowman of Oryx because Oryx had a wig like that and she liked to dress up and changer her appearance to pretend to be different women. He leaps out of a broken window and sees directly across from him a quintuplet of pigoons rooting around in a small heap of trash. His relationship with these animals has changed overtime. His father used to work on a pigoon project at OrganInc farms. When young Jimmy used to go visit them he felt pity for them now he has to run for his life away from them. The pigoons, Crakers, and rakunk all symbolize parts of Snowman’s past. The pigoons were a part of his childhood in relation to his father’s relationship. The Crakers was the beliefs of Snowman’s once best friend. The rakunk, Killer, represent Jimmy’s pet from when he was younger. These creations are a reminder of a past that he can’t escape and his ongoing recollection of the past is portrayed as he lives in a world of his memories.
Jimmy graduates from Martha Graham and I unsuccessful in finding a job in his field. He moves in with his girlfriend, Amanda Payne, he is attracted to her because of her difficult background and is desired to save her from her problems. The death of his mother left Jimmy hurt and never found a resolution. Also with the CorpSeCorps questioning about his mothers whereabouts also kept him even more emotional. He gets a job at AnooYoo and doesn’t really like it but he sticks with it. Once he is given a promotion things start to change for Jimmy and starts to look for women once again. He becomes intimate with married and committed women and he finds this to sooth him because it required no emotional feelings on his part towards these women. Oryx enters his life once again while watching tv about a girl that was trapped in a garage and see Oryx as the girl. Oryx serves in Jimmy’s life during critical points in his life. After not hearing from the CorpSeCoprs for five years they show up at his door and show him a video, which was about his mothers execution. Her last words in the video were, “Goodbye. Remember Killer. I love you. Don’t let me down.” No question that was Jimmy’s mother. He pretended he didn’t know who the woman in the video was when they asked but after a little while he told them about Killer who was his pet rakunk. Later he questioned himself if the execution was even real and if she was still alive. The next couple of days were bad for Jimmy between anger and sadness. He coped with these feelings with sex and alcohol but it didn’t work for him. Once again he would have nightmares of the image of Oryx as a child.
In chapter 11 Snowman is trying to escape from the pigoons. He is trying to outsmart a creature that thinks more like a human and less like a pig. During this time both Snowman and the pigoons have physical restraints because Snowman has injured his foot and the pigoons have short legs are unable to climb to the watchtower. Snowman has success against the pigoons and outsmarts them. While using a radio Snowman hears a voice and now it changes Snowman’s world. Snowman sees from afar a smoke coming from the Crakers encampment. He thinks that it is mist but figures it is smoke. The Crakers always had a fire going but not such a large one before. He thinks they had disobeyed his orders and now have come looking for him and built a signal fire to guide him home.
These chapters I believe shows a pivotal part throughout the story by many things happening. One many memories of him and Crake together of him missing these subliminal messages Crake were portraying. Another of Snowman realizing all the destruction that he hasn’t encounter while walking to RejoovenEsense. Also when the pigoons looking for fresh meat to eat become hunters instead of animals is very eye opening because of his history with these animals. The showing of his mother being murdered becomes a significant stamp through his life. Because of this he starts to imagine Oryx again and again. The most vital part is when Snowman hears someone on the radio and finds out that he may not be the only human alive and which encourages him even more.
Timothy Morton, “Dark Ecology,” relates to Oryx and Crake in a couple of ways. Morton starts to explain what Dark ecology is which is, ecological awareness, dark-depressing but yet ecological awareness is also dark-uncanny. He also goes on to say Ecognosis is something like coexisting. Also is like becoming accustomed to something strange that doesn’t become less strange. This relates to Snowman’s current being in which he is trying to become accustomed to something strange, which is in the state where he is living in. He compares the word, weird, to the Old Norse urth, meaning twisted in a loop. He says that the term weird is a turn or a twist or loop, a turn of events. This also relates to Snowman’s position he is currently in. Morton infers to a term called weird weirdness. He states that ecological awareness is weird. He says that ecological awareness is a loop because human interference has a loop form. He explains that loop from of beings means we live in a universe of finitude and fragility and a world surrounded by mysterious and hermeneutical clouds of unknowing. In the ecologoical paradigm we need to embrace a reality that exists as strange loops. This means that reality is multi-dimensional and Morton also talks about Object-oriented ontology, or OOO. He says that ontology doesn’t tell you what exists but how things exist. OOO is a view of reality and that all of reality is made up of object things and the things that make up reality are shifting. Morton also He uses the story of Jekyll and Hyde and James Lovelock’s analogy of “species equivalent” of the characters.
Questions:
1) Is there a future coexistence?
2) What is the dark ecology in Oryx and Crake?
3) How would the novel change if narrated by Oryx?
Memoirs of a Clone
Never Let Me Go & Autobiographical Memoirs
Much of the novel is narrated from Kathy and the timeline is often non-linear. The novel is broken into three parts, and the three parts closely align with Kathy’s three stages of life. Kathy is quite good at being a carer, but her work is extremely difficult and lonely. The novels progression closely resembles the human development cycle. We see part one talk about Halisham the school, and how it’s a lot like primary school. Students interact with each other, and friendships are formed. Part two is the next phase of life, much like high school or college. You have an infusion of new people like the “veterans” that come in and mingle with Kathy, Tommy, and Ruth. As you get older, attraction and formal relationships begin to emerge. We even see a sense of jealousy between Kathy and Ruth over Tommy. This jealousy concept is analogous to teenage love and crushes. Finally, at Part Three, Kathy becomes a carer. This is very much like when a person finishes colleges and begins to join the workforce. During this transitional period for humans, you lose the chance to socialize with people you were once close to. People are usually so consumed with work, there is not enough time in the day to socialize, and they often become lonely. Kathy is experiencing this as a carer.
The pacing in part three seemed very quick. I correlate the pacing to the quote “life flashes before your eyes.” Kathy grew up with Tommy and Ruth for most of the book. Then suddenly in Part three, we learn Ruth already is a donor. It was also found out that Ruth had a bad first donation. Kathy eventually becomes Ruth’s carer. It seems like just recently the two friends were fighting, and now we see Ruth almost near completion (another term for deceased). In part three the characters spend a lot of time reminiscing the old days at Halisham. Kathy noted that when she and Tommy ganged up on Ruth in the car, Ruth would have snapped back at them in the old days. Kathy reminded Ruth of the magazine ad they saw near the cottages, and Tommy recalls their trip to Norfolk. All these memories correlate with being adults and reminiscing about the past. Ruth and Kathy had ongoing tensions in their friendship, due to Kathy’s unspoken feelings for Tommy. Ruth and Tommy shared a past as a couple, which separates them from Kathy. With life being so short, Ruth tries to make amends with Kathy with hope. Ruth hopes to change the future between Tommy and Kathy, by giving Madame’s’ address, which represents a chance at deferral. Halisham was closed down, and deferral was a chance at not becoming a donor. Ruth’s apology and her gift show that despite her flaws, she is still good inside. The friendship becomes more open and nostalgic. Instead of speaking about the future, Ruth and Kathy look back on their shared memories of the past. Ruth turns to memories of Hailsham in the face of her coming donation, while her only allusions to the future concern Kathy and Tommy. This is much like when we are faced with death, we try to make up to the people we care about if there were any misunderstandings.
Ruth completes after her third donation, and Kathy is now left to be Tommy’s carer. The romance begins to bud, and they become physically intimate. A long overdue loving relationship, is up against time. Tommy is nearing completion, so Kathy and Tommy travel to Madame’s house to seek deferral. Tommy and Kathy find the answers that they have been seeking since childhood, but it ends in disappointment when Miss Emily once and for all dismisses the possibility of a deferral. Hailsham thus lives up to its name, exposed as a “sham” maintained through elaborate acts of deception by Miss Emily and Madame. Although Miss Emily and Madame attempted to show the clones’ humanity to the outside world, they themselves struggled to believe what they preached. Tommy in his last days said to Kathy that although they have loved each other their whole lives, they cannot stay together forever. Tommy and Kathy share a goodbye kiss, and then Kathy drives away.
In “Speculative Memoirs” by Keith Macdonald, he presents information on how “Let Me Go” has many techniques and contains elements of an autobiographical memoir. Keith Macdonald states that we can see the autobiographical exchange is both pervasive and effective in this context. Never Let Me Go is a fictional novel that was able to replicate an autobiography. Although the novel has a horrific back story of harvesting clone’s organs for the sole purpose of science, as the story progresses, the main text focuses on the everyday nature of the friendships and love affairs that grow in Hailsham. The novel has particularly focused on the lives of the clones rather than a dogmatic take on the institutionalized cloning with scientific jargon. I tend to agree much what Macdonald is trying to promote here. We see the novel broken down into stages of life and memory. It correlates very closely with human development, yet Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy were clones and not viewed by Madame and Miss Emily as actual humans. Yet the way this story was told was through narration by Kathy. We see all the human elements and believe Kathy is real. Macdonald supports this proposition “The novel draws attention to itself as a construction, strengthening the illusion that it is the narrator telling this story, and that the reader acknowledges the authenticity of the narrative, distancing Ishiguro from the writing process.”
Frankenstein is a tale like Let Me Go. Frankenstein can be viewed as a battle between two autobiographies vying for the reader’s attention in a contest for limited moral superiority. In Frankenstein we have Victor begging Walden, to make sure he recounts the tale of creature and how he was made. Victor was obsessed in making sure all the details were correct on the birth of Frankenstein and the potential danger he was capable of. We also get an autobiographical account with the creature himself. The readers understand how creature grew up and learned how cruel mankind could be. The readers sympathize with creature much like how they sympathize with the clones. The clones and creatures were not deemed human, but they display more elements of proper humanity. Victor and Miss Emily were human, but they were cruel overlords with absolutely no sympathy. Miss Emily denied deferral and giving Kathy and Tommy love, much like Victor denied creature a mate to live with happily in love.
1.) Looking back in time, do you have any life experiences you can relate with the characters Kathy, Ruth, and Tommy when you were growing up?
2.) Did Kathy and the clones seem more human than Madame and Miss Emily?
3.) Do you agree with Macdonald that an autobiographical memoir style was a good way to present the novel Let Me Go? What other genre/style would be effective?
Never Let Me Go and Powers of Horror
Sophia Naeem
Professor Walker
Engl 151W
29 April 2018
Never Let Me Go and Powers of Horror
In the book, “Never Let Me Go” by Kazuo Ishiguro, we learn about the childhood of a woman named Kathy H. Throughout the beginning and into most of the book, Kathy describes her recollection of memories from her life at her town of Hailsham where she was a student of a special institute, although we aren’t aware it’s a special institution in the beginning. Though her narration is very vague in the beginning when she talks about events from her childhood at this school, we are led to believe that she was very privileged to have came from such a place. We see this earlier in the book when Kathy introduces herself to the readers as a ‘carer’ and tells us a brief story about a ‘donor’ that was in her care who wished to be told stories of Hailsham by Kathy so he could imagine it like he was there and as if her memories at Hailsham were his own. As carer, Kathy was in charge of making the overall quality of life better for the donors during their donation process. The words ‘donor’ and ‘carer’ were mentioned in passing from the beginning of the book, as if they’re not important factors in the story, when in fact these were some of the most important key points to know in order to have a better understanding of the book. The story goes on a few chapters with detailed recollections of Kathy’s childhood with her friends Ruth and Tommy, until we eventually find out that these students at Hailsham’s special institute, including Kathy, Ruth and Tommy, were all clones and apart of a special new government program that explored the idea of treating clones with special care and attention. These students were created as clones in order to harvest new organs for the public to receive—thus they received the name ‘donors’. Although Kathy H was also a clone, she was not considered a donor in the beginning and instead worked as a carer because she had elected to do so, which entailed her taking care of the donors during the process of them donating their organs. However, the clones were only allowed to work as carer for only a short amount of time, as they soon were required to eventually stop work as carer and become donors themselves. The life of these clones were very short, since they all essentially died by the time they were approximately in their 30’s, as a result of multiple donations of their organs, usually dying after about 3-4 donations.
At Hailsham, Kathy recounts her time at the school, where she spent most of her time with her friends Ruth and Tommy. Her recollection of her childhood begins after she mentions seeing Ruth when they got older and becoming her carer throughout her donation process. After she tells her account of memories from her past, which were not in chronological order and instead just retold based on what came to her head, Kathy begins to discuss more recent events following Ruth’s “completion” which was the term used for when the donors died after completing their donation process. During Kathy’s childhood, Ruth and Tommy were a romantic couple, even though Ruth always knew Kathy had feelings for Tommy. While Ruth was in Kathy’s care during her donation process, Ruth made an effort to make right by Kathy before “completing” since she felt she had always been a barrier between Kathy and Tommy, by convincing her to find Tommy since he was a donor and to enjoy whatever time they could together as a couple. As what seemed to by a last good dying deed to clean her own conscious, Ruth also informs Kathy about a rumored ability for donors to request something called a deferral, which would allow them both to defer their donations on the premise that they were in love. Unfortunately, while in pursuit of finding ex-officials of the Hailsham school to discuss the potential of being granted a deferral in order to spend some quality time with Tommy, after waiting so long to have the opportunity to be with him, Kathy and Tommy both find out the rumor was just that—a mere rumor. Tommy ends up dying after he completes his donation process and the story ends with Kathy driving away.
In Powers of Horror, Julia Kristeva discusses abjection, which Kristeva explains as the feeling of horror you experience as a result of something that threatens you such as the feeling of looking at a corpse and knowing the inevitability of death. She explains that this feeling is what causes us trauma. In “Never Let You Go”, some of the clones lived most of their lives in curiosity about their existence and what lies beyond the gates of their school in Hailsham, as rumors were surfacing among the clones, that the teachers were keeping them safe from a terrible threat that lurked outside.
Another reading that is similar in certain areas with “Never Let Me Go” from our class is “Frankenstein”. Just as the clones were created without any knowledge of their purpose in life, the creature from Frankenstein also had some similarities as he also searched for answers and looked for knowledge and seeked information. He longed for a partner the same way Kathy H from “Never Let Me Go” longed for Tommy, but never could be with him because of Ruth. Also, the clones and the creature from Frankenstein wished to have a parent like figure in their lives, but in both stories, the clones and the creature were shunned upon because they were different.
- Could there be a possibility of “Never Let Me Go”, happening in the near future, where clones are used to harvest human organs for the public with the approval of the majority public?
- Could perhaps the interpretation of the readings be biased because of an exaggeration by the narrators to describe difficult times using extreme analogies?
- Were the clones from Hailsham in “Never Let Me Go” dying at such an early age in life because of the concept of abjection, which is explained by Julia Kristeva in Powers of Horror, where the fear of death was more traumatic to them than their actual donation process?
Sigmund Freud’s “The “Uncanny”” an Oryx and Crake
It all starts with the uncanny. Unheimlich, or uncanny in english, is the opposite of heimlich. This is to say that heimlich always becomes unheimlich and that the two are linked with one another. Heimlich is defined as belonging to the house, not strange, familiar, tame, intimate, comfortable, homely, etc. “Thus heimlich is a word the meaning of which develops towards ambivalence, until it finally coincides with the opposite, unheimlich.”(Pg 4)
Freud goes on to mention an author by the name of Jentsch, with whom successful uncanny writing is associated with. Jentsch believes that one of the most successful ways in which to tell a story that has the effects of the uncanny in it is to leave the readers in a state in which they are unsure of whether or not a particular character is human or automation, but to do it in a way as such that the readers attention is not brought to that and as such they can not immediately clear up their misunderstanding. Refering to “The Sand Man” in Hoffmann’s Nachtstücken which contains the original of Olympia a doll in the first act of Offenbach’s opera, The Tales of Hoffmann. Olympia is used in a way that leaves the reader uncertain. It is further disguised by the rest of what is happening in the story with the fear of the loss of eyes. As such when the character Nathaniel falls in love with Olympia, whilst betrothed to another, it attributes to the belief that Olympia is human. However with Nathaniel’s constant encounters with the Sandman, whom has several different personas, it hides the fact that Olympia is an automaton. The importance of mentioning this piece of work is that Freud then relates the fear of losing eyes, which is very prevalent in this story, to that of castration.
Freud describes the thought behind what is known as a “castration complex”. The fear of losing one’s eyes, which is typically gained during one’s childhood, can be transferred to the same action on other parts of the body. By relating the uncanny effect of Nathaniel’s dread of the Sandman to the castration complex you can see how it is Freud arrived at the idea of the uncanniness of the castration complex. It is this feeling that can be attributed to feelings of uncanniness, and we can take this and attempt to apply it to other instances of the uncanny.
Another instance that Freud uses to describe this feeling is that of seeing the same number several time during a short period of time. Doing such would give us the feeling of uncanny and tempt us to give meaning to this number, an example used by Freud an indication of the life span allocated to the individual.The feeling of uncanny can be sparked from coincidence as seen with the numbers but also through words. Freud tells us of a patient with whom upon visiting a hydropathic establishment and believing that it was the situation of his room and not the water that lead to his improvement. It is important to note that this specific room was adjourned to an amiable nurse. When upon a later visit told that the specific room was occupied he wished the man in there to have a stroke and die, which he did a fortnight later. His patient described the feeling as uncanny. Freud says that that feeling would have been even stronger had those events happened closer to one another.
Freud focuses heavily on the idea of heimlich and unheimlich. Alternatively you can experience one without the experience of the other. Simply put if you did not know anything other that the current nothing would seem to be uncanny, and yet everything would seem familiar. This idea can be supported by the character Jimmy from Oryx and Crake. There are a vast amount of changes throughout the novel and yet Jimmy does not really believe it to be strange. Partially due to the location of his upbringing, the crazy genetic modifications that occur to animals throughout the book are not something that Jimmy sees as strange, that is until he sees the ChickieNobs. This sea anemone like chicken growing organisms foster the feeling of uncanny in Jimmy not because of what they are, but because they have no heads. It is this reason that causes the appearance of uncanny within the character, which until this point had been largely non-existent. It is important to try and perceive uncanny in this way as it is not something that is reliant, there are several different way towards reaching this feeling that Freud describes, but not one of them states there needs to be a feeling of familiarity first.
In relation to Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood, one encounter that can be seen as very important inspires similar feelings of uncanniness within Jimmy. Shortly after going to work at Paradice with Crake, Jimmy realizes that the girl he has fantasized over for many years is there, but she is there for Crake. Soon after however, when Oryx visits Jimmy’s room in the middle of the night, things change. Jimmy constantly has an uncanny feeling and asks questions about Oryx’s childhood and frequently worries about Crake finding out. When in this situation that by Jimmy’s ideals should be near perfect for him, he can’t help but being worried and feeling uncanny. To Jimmy, the guy who has been with countless women and quite honestly has never been attached, it is a strange feeling to be with someone whom he wasn’t just with for the physical benefit. Furthermore Oryx is both familiar to Jimmy as well as unknown. This is easy to see with Jimmy’s fixation on the childhood of Oryx. Furthermore in Jimmy as a character when it comes to his relation with Oryx he typically has the feeling of uncanny and it can also be seen in the way he communicates with Oryx.
- Throughout Oryx and Crake there are many “technological advancements’.” Suppose you were living through the creation of these, is it something you would want to advance further for the potential of its medical purposes? Other reasons? Why?
- You see the number 13 frequently throughout a day, how does this make you feel and are you uncomfortable?
- Your Victor Frankenstein and you’ve just completed creature, it looks far from human. How do you feel about it and how does it relate to your view on the genetically modified organisms we see in Oryx and Crake?
“The uncanny” & Oryx & Crake
Sigmund Freud “The Uncanny” was published in the 20th century. Freud’s notion draws on the origin of the german word “Unheimliche,” vs “Heimlisch” which is also refered to as “homely.” “Uncanny” is not necessarily the opposite of homely, but it is a word that has a sense of antipathy with the home. ” The uncanny” refers to something fearful and frightening, but has been neglected in the history of aesthetics. The uncanny is the subject of aesthetics and has to do with a certain kind of feeling or sensation involving emotional impulses. After a long discussion, Freud argues the notion of Hemilich “unhomely” relates to something that is actually known and comfortable. Home” is a secret place for Freud. The unhomely/ The uncanny is later revealed, and both has seperate and two complete different meanings. For example:The mannequin is something that appears to be a human figure and familiar, but it is actually just plastic and lifeless. It is a cause of dread which is the result of not knowing when you first look at it, that it is either a human being or a piece of plastic that it is. Based on the interpretation, if psychoanalysis is right, it is explained as for us humans that people could often relate to- anxiety. Anxiety in an individuals life is the uncanny which is rediscovered after repression. Freud states us humans have all went through some type of experience with “the uncanny.” It is something that triggers us back to repressed childhood and conflicts or beliefs that we overcome but suddenly receive new assertion.
The Uncanny comes into comparison with Oryx and crake chapters twelve to fifteen. It is clear that chapters 12-15 often bounces back and forth from snowman’s present to his past memories as Jimmy. Part 12 ends very violently. When the apocalypse occurred, crake slit Oryxs throat, and jimmy shooting him. Jimmy has lost the two most important people in his life in a matter of seconds at this point. The trauma that results from this moment is what haas drove his obsessive memories. Jimmy was left with the task of caring for the only beings in the planet which was the crakers. He felt that he was obligated to do this. The crakers were a metaphor for jimmy by replacing him and his mothers relationship, and therefore did not want to abandon them. Jimmy was left in a symbiotic relationship and both needed each other for survival. Later on snowman shows signs of losing himself to reality due to exhaustion, pain, and lack of nutrition that he is not getting. Snowman leads crakers to their new beach home and had to shoot a few infected people and go though abandoned objects.
The story ends with Snowman’s present, as he realizes there are people that exist. There are two males and one female, which is clearly possible for them to reproduce. Snowman contemplates what to do. One side of him remembers what Crake says, and wants to kill them because he remembered crake said he was counting on him, and the other side of him just does not want to do and wants to just walk away. The ending is left with a cliff hanger and leaves it up to the readers to figure out what he did based on his past and present experiences.
One of the examples for Freud’s was the mannequin. When we first glance at a mannequin, were not sure if it is real or fake. But if that mannequin started to move or shake our hand, we would definitely feel some type of discomfort or feel uncomfortable despite the fact that looks like a human. We would feel uncomfortable because of the simple fact that it is not human and is not suppose to move if it is plastic. Just like in Frankenstein, and oryx and crake, both stories include characters that are are not humans but have some characteristics that humans have. For example: Frankenstein is somewhat a monster, and technically not human, and just like in comparison to the crakers. They are human like creations that can speak and reason, but they are not human, just like a mannequin is not human despite of how it looks and the features that it has.
Just like the uncanny relates to something that triggers us back to repressed childhood and conflicts or beliefs that we overcome, snowman is constantly going back and forth reflecting to his childhood and past memories and his present life as well.
Discussion question:
- What is ” The uncanny” in Oryx and Crake? What resembles it?
- What if mannequins did start moving or walking, how would society react to this and feel? Would they accept it?
- Do you agree that all humans relate to “The uncanny” and have experienced this somehow someway in their life?
Oryx and Crake
Chapter 5 is where it is established that Snowman “also known as Jimmy ”is officially the last original Craker. Snowman has all of this power to make rules and regulations that everyone has to follow. The small children’s that lived in his village would always question why he would always talk to himself, he always got annoyed at them and he would tell them to leave him alone and if they didn’t then they would be toast. The metaphor that he used they never would understand because they do not use metaphors in their everyday life. They only interpret words as is with just one meaning to it. They lack so much creativity and art and this why Snowman has such a hard time communicating and relating to them. Jimmy loves language, art and human creativity. He has made them perform rituals. This depicts language will be going through some type of extinction and destruction because it lack linguistic structures and lacked judgments. Snowman despised the way the Crakers lived, but he had no choice but to follow rules that he already made up.
Snowman has responsibilities as a role model because he makes rules and daily routines for the people in his village. Crakers are vegetarians and he has set a ritual for them to feed him as their daily duties. After feeding him one day he decides to draw a picture with mud to depict chaos and how he would get rid of it by making the great emptiness. The Crakers were so confused and thought he was trying to have the perception of God. After, he started to be questioned and wanted to know how was Crake born? He didn’t want to be questioned much about his statement so he tried to think of the simplest answer, which was Crake came from the sky, like thunder. He then tries to get out from the situation and tells them he is too exhausted to talk. But, his response shows some type of God like influence because he said Crake just came from the sky.
Oryx is the girl that Snowman loves and he tries to explain that it isn’t just sexual fantasies. Oryx went through a different life than Snowman and when she explains her story to him he starts to feel rage because of her past. Oryx was sold when she was younger to her Uncle En. Her uncle had a lot of children that he was responsible for and he made them work to make him money. She understood that her mother had sold her because she loved her and didn’t want her to be lonesome. Snowman is so angered by her life and they can’t relate to each other’s life because Snowman lived a grateful life. Because she lacked love from her mother she found that her mother followed her and spoke to her to through nature. The birds whistling would be the noise of her mother comforting her as she walked through the forest. Her uncle had drove them over a border where they were check pointed and he gave them money to let them go. This depicted that her life was basically passed through service of money. Oryx brother and her were put to sell and because of his lack of physical attraction and he would always do terrible at sales. One day he heard that he would be doing prostitution runs and he ended up running away to an unknown world that he didn’t know about. Uncle En arranges her up with men to go to hotels so he could bust into the room and scare the men who ask for sexual services. He makes it seem like he’s saving her, but he does it to frighten the men and they give all the money in their wallet. Uncle En tells her loves her and tells her he wish he could marry her, but he only says that to continue for her to be okay with this situation to make him more money. She later goes on to telling him that she would have secluded sex with Jack and he would teach her English. This infuriated Snowman so much by her acceptance of this life she lived. When she speaks to him she sees how much of a Crake he is, by the way he communicates and reacts to what she says. After he wakes up he debates on leaving Crake, but he doesn’t because he realizes he would be putting his people at risk for endangerment. As he enters back to the site, everyone is doing their day-to-day routine and the men start to urinate around their territory so no predators would come their way.
Andermatt wrote his dissertation “Toxic Discourse” about people going through environment disasters affects us psychologically and when it attacks our personal space and where we live. In relation to Onyx and Crake, there could have been a reason like a natural disaster wiped out the original Crakers and Snowman is the only one left. As for his it affecting him emotionally it has taken a toll on him because of his loneliness and responsibility of keeping them safe. Since, Snowman feels like he has to protect everyone he feels as if he has to take care of the environment they live in. Toxic Discourse talks about us depending on nature, food, water, and shelter and only if it is endangered then we actually care.
Toxic Discourse says, “The real toxicity is established when there is a fear of the unknown. Oryx brother had run away when he heard that he would have to be a prostituted in fear of the unknown.
Questions:
- Are we that selfish to only care when it’s us being affected?
- Do you think you would make rule or rituals for people to serve you food the way Snowman did?
- Why do you think the Crakers didn’t see it morally wrong for serving Snowman as a ritual?
The Path of Humanity
The first four parts of Attwood’s Oryx and Crake are spent with the supposed only remaining human on the planet explaining his experiences both in the present and the past. A plague appears to have wiped out all of humanity. It is not clear if this plague was a result of the genetic experimentation taking place in the labs of his past. There are other intelligent beings in the present but there is a lack of a physical description other than they are children who are naked, beautiful, and look nothing like the past version of man, Jimmy.
The idea of nature appears to have undergone drastic changes. The animals are hybrids of multiple animals put together. Whether they are just escapees from the labs after man’s downfall or a crossbreeding occurring in nature itself is unclear. The weather has extreme rains and winds as well as extreme heat. Jimmy, as a past human, is not physically built to withstand these changes and must hide but it appears this latest version of humanity, the children, are part of an adaptive evolutionary man. They can roam naked in the sun and enjoy its extreme warmth.
The flashbacks to Jimmy’s past are a mix of descriptions of the world from a scientific view as well as experiences of a child looking to find his way in life. Jimmy has a father who is excited about his genetic experimentation with these lab animals and his mother is a scientist who was once just like Jimmy’s father but now is disgusted with the immoral and unethical route these scientific pursuits have taken. Jimmy describes being a mediocre student, having his first crush and playing online games with his best friend Crake. On the surface it appears to be the normal life of a kid, but it is far from it. It is a disturbing view of what humanity may become if the single minded scientific pursuits to further “improve” life without regard for the consequences of nature continue. Jimmy appears to be living in a world where man has forgotten that he is not the only important being on a planet designed for his use but rather just a part of something much bigger that requires continued respect for all parts because they only work together, or they don’t survive. Some may argue that the scientific pursuits of animal incubators for human longevity and beauty are not completely indicative of an unethical society. It is important to remember the details of Jimmy’s experiences with Crake as two kids watching their favorite shows. It is not your typical superhero tale but rather a gruesome scene of live animal and human torture for entertainment. It appears as if only the pornography itself is limited to adults and even then, the idea that child pornography is so easily accessible is despicable and unforgiving. To be human is to have empathy, feelings, thoughts and an understanding of the vastness of the universe. This novel poses many questions regarding the effects science has on our definition of what it means to be human.
Attwood seems to have a knack for creating dystopian societies where the current day issues and fears such as inequality and immorality are brought to their extreme as a warning of what may be to come if we, as humans, do not stop and think about our actions and their consequences.
Ihab Hassan wrote an essay in play format, Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Post Humanist Culture, involving the levels of human consciousness and post humanism as it is understood and interpreted today (1976) and by the greatest minds of history across many areas of study. It questions the definition of post humanism and if it really means a world without humans or if it just implies something else. The idea that for each new discovery of human ability we change humanity so dramatically that these new generations should be considered post humanist generations to those that came before. The characters in the play are the various levels of our human consciousness and the struggle between them. It is metaphorical for our inner struggle of good versus evil and all levels in between. In changing the way we interpret the same idea such as scientific pursuits and accomplishments can we justify the path used to reach the goal despite a fear of the darkness the path involves. While the play went back and forth in many directions and quoted many different historical figures who made major advancements in science or philosophical understanding the overall themes seemed to remain the same. What are the implications of science in our consciousness? Does the advancement of technology hinder humanities ability to value the beauty of what once was such as the photograph replacing the art of the painted hand? Scientific advancements change the way we see humanity! There will always be the side that feels that we, as a species, are strong and will survive. We will adapt and evolve so science and technology are not to be restricted. Then there are those that argue we are a new species in a much older universe and just as other species have come and gone we will be the creators of our own extinction.
So how do the writings of Hassan tie into the readings in class. Ironically Frankenstein was used as an example in the play where prior to his formal education and introduction to a shallow science he pursued the teachings of some of the greater minds in scientific history. However, when shown what the newer sciences were capable of, he took his pursuits to a level that crossed the ethical boundaries between good and evil and created life where life wasn’t meant to be created. This resulted in his downfall. It could be interpreted that humanity in Attwood’s novel underwent the same fate. A failure to acknowledge that science is not always used for good and the allowance of selfish and vain endeavors will result in paying the ultimate price.
Questions:
1 – As scientific and technological advances are introduced into society are they removing our ability to see we are not indestructible or had humanity already begun to lose its moral compass and the ability to make scientific advances was the result?
2 – Are we the post humanist society to ancient civilizations as a result of our scientific advancements?
3 – If we could extend our lives by 50 or 100 years by using animals as incubators would that be ethical?
“On Ghosts” by Mary Shelley
Mary Shelley has always been influenced by great stories depicting ghosts and the supernatural. Her great work “Frankenstein” was written under a rather extraordinary situation, she wrote it after accepting a dare which was to see who could write the best horror story in her group of friends. We all know the horror aspects that “Frankenstein” has are great, but without taking any authenticity from them, we have to acknowledge the fact that they were all influenced by horror stories, more specifically a collection of German horror stories under the title “Fantasmagoriana”. Mary Shelley references 2 stories from the “Fantasmagoriana” the first is called “The History of The Inconstant Lover” and the second was “The Tale of The Single founder of his Race”. If that does not facilitate that horror stories influenced Mary Shelley than her own essay titled “On Ghost” should do it.
The essay “On Ghost” was printed in the London Magazine in March of 1824. In this essay, Mary Shelley laments with a great feeling of melancholy the lack of mystery, wonder, and supernatural in modern literature and culture. She explains how the strange tails believed and feared by past generations are no longer seen to be part of reality or have an effect during this wiser age.
“What has become of enchantresses with their palaces of crystal and dungeons of palpable darkness? What of fairies and their wands? What of witches and their familiars? and, last, what of ghosts, with beckoning hands and fleeting shapes, which quelled the soldier’s brave heart, and made the murderer disclose to the astonished noon the veiled work of Midnight?”
Mary then goes on to question whether modern human society has really stopped believing in ghost and the supernatural entirely. With that in her mind, she explains the notion that it is easy to dismiss the possibility of the supernatural in the light of noon-day; but a midnight everything seems to change, when we find ourselves inside a lonely house with flapping curtains, eerie hallways, cold night wind blowing, reading the Bleeding nun, we’re not so certain and fear begins to overwhelm us. While Mary explains that she has never seen a real ghost herself, she relates the tales of Thomas Jefferson Hogg, who claimed to have seen the lost ghost of a recently-deceased friend, and Angelo Mengaldo, who saw the headless ghost of a war comrade who had killed himself after falling in love with a woman who did not return his passion.
These tales may come across as rather far-fetched, but both men are presented as being reliable and of sound mind; Hogg is described as a person of ‘strong and virile intellect’, and Mengaldo is said to be ‘by no means addicted to superstition’. During this time Mary Shelley also plays with the idea that the nature of the supernatural meaning the good and evil depends on the circumstances of the individuals death, we see how Hogg’s friend came back to visit him while he slept and caressed his cheek and as soon a Hogg moved out of the house, the ghost of his friend stopped appearing. While on the other hand, Mangaldo’s experience is far more sinister, perhaps due to the fact that his companion died by suicide, he committed a sin and now his soul is distorted. The essay closes with a final account that Mary describes as not so authentic but none the less amusing. The story, Mary explains, was told by M. G. Lewis, the famous author of The Monk. It is certainly a strange supernatural tale, but is it true? I’ll leave you to make up your own mind.
Discussion Questions
- Why has our society moved away from stories regarding the supernatural?
- What do you think made Mary Shelley fascinate about horror stories?
- What aspects of the supernatural do you see in Mary Shelley’s “Frankenstein”?
- What’s your opinion on ghosts?
Jekyll, Hyde and Duality
Chapter 6 or “Remarkable Incident of Dr. Lanyon” begins with aa description of how Dr. Jekyll has changed back for the better after the disappearance of Mr. Hyde. He has started to be more social and positive, entertaining and working more in charity. But then suddenly Jekyll starts refusing to take visitors. Utterson knows that Lanyon has seen Jekyll so decides to talk to him, only to find that Lanyon is in terrible condition. He explains he’s had “ a shock” and he expects to die soon. He also shows a great distain for Jekyll. He explains that after his death all will be explained. Utterson then exchanges letters with Jekyll but this doesn’t shed anymore light on the matter. Jekyll explains that he understands Lanyon’s views and still refuses visits. Soon later Lanyon dies and Utterson picks up an envelope marked for him to open at Lanyon’s death; only to find another envelope marked to be opened at Jekyll’s death. Utterson honors the marking of the letter.
“Incident at the Window” begins with Utterson and Enfield taking their walk discussing the door, Hyde, and Jekyll. After discussing concern for his health, they see Jekyll at his window. They ask him to join their walk but he refuses politely, though they suggest it would be good for him. They decide to continue talking when suddenly a look of horror appears on Jekyll’s face and he slams the window, vanishing. This encounter shocks both men.
In “The Last Night” Poole come to Utterson concerned for the well being of Jekyll. When reach the house the voice coming from the lab is not Jekyll’s. The voice refuses to receive visitors and Poole explains that he keeps getting sent on errands by this person, for an ingredient that no one has. Poole reveals that the man inside is Mr. Hyde. With this new knowledge Utterson decides to break into the lab. Utterson demands to be let in but the voice, which Utterson knows to be Hyde’s, refuses. They break down the door and find Hyde on the floor seemingly poisoned. Hyde is clearly wearing a suit of Jekyll’s but there is no sign of him or his body. They then find an envelope addressed to Utterson containing a will leaving everything to him, a note telling him to read Lanyon’s letter, and a sealed envelope. Utterson then leaves to read Lanyon’s letter.
The chapter “Dr. Lanyon’s Narrative” shows the events as they transpired according to Lanyon through a letter to Utterson. The story begins with Lanyon receiving a letter from Jekyll after his dinner party. The letter asked him to break in to Jekyll’s lab and steal a specific drawer, take it home and wait. It said that if he did this all would be explained. He did as asked with the help of Poole and a locksmith taking vials with red liquid, salt, and a book of notes. He waited at home and at the stroke of midnight Hyde showed up exchanging no pleasantries and asking to be directly shown to the drawer. Hyde mixed the ingredients and before drinking to offered Lanyon to not see what would happen next. After he drank it Lanyon watched Hyde transform back in to Dr. Jekyll. The letter then explains that this wrecked all that Lanyon had understood to be true and would lead to his death.
The final chapter is the tale told from the perspective of Dr. Jekyll through the letter he leaves for Utterson. In his letter he explains that he has always felt that there were two sides to him and he always felt guilt for the darker one he hid from the world. He explains that in creation the potion he risked his life by taking it a first but after the transformation his darker impulses took hold. At first he welcomed the new him in which he was able to release his repressed impulses without guilt. This was fine until he transformed without taking the potion. This scared him into stopping the transformation for two months, until he gave in to his desire and drank the potion again. Hyde having been repressed for so long lashed out and murdered Carew, with no remorse. This made him vow to never transform again. This was fine until Hyde took over again; knowing the police would stop him if he went home had Lanyon get his potions. He was growing weaker as Hyde grew stronger, having to take double potion to hold him back. Not being able to recreate the potion and facing certain death, Hyde decided to poison them both and end it.
Anne Stiles compares Jekyll and Hyde to the “Dual-Brain Theory”, which states that the left side of the brain relates to intelligence, linguistic, and logical thinking; while the right is more emotional, inferior, and prone to wrongdoing. This theory is problematic at its base as it states that the left side is more predominantly used by white intellectual males, while the right is for the feminine and animal. Putting aside its racist and sexist connotations, it does have a strong connection to the literature. Through this lens, you see Dr. Jekyll as the clear left brain and Mr. Hyde as the clear right, even giving Hyde animal like characteristics.
Diving further into their characteristics making them both great examples of this theory. On the side of the left brain you have Jekyll, a well-mannered, well liked, intellectual. But this potion seems to switch the function of his brain to the lesser used right side. This leaves you with Hyde, an unpleasant man, who is disliked by everyone who meets him. Hyde also connects the criminal aspect of this theory by literally committing assault and murder. As the right side is used more it grows while the other shrinks.
Though this connection clearly holds up, I always thought of it a little differently. I always thought of both sides as one cohesive person, and what makes us who we are is what we choose to listen to and/or repress. It was also my understanding that the potion was a metaphor for drugs or alcohol. The way it inhibits our normal behavior and can wildly change someone who is known to be a stand-up person. The thoughts have always been there but the filter or decision making holding them back is gone.
A connection I definitely did see was to Samuel Taylor Coeridge’s “Christabel”. How you see this kind person and everything is not quite what it seems. You never quite know what is happening in someone’s head or what they’re capable of. Such as Geraldine has a façade and turns out to have malicious intent.
Discussion Questions:
1) If anything what do you think the distinction between Jekyll and Hyde symbolizes?
2) Do you think all people have a good and evil side?
3) Would the potion have the same effect on all people?
Robert Louis Stevenson,”The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, Ch 1-5
A wealthy lawyer, Mr. Utterson is a very boring man, who is very close with his relative, Mr. Enfield. One day, on their usual Sunday stroll, Enfield walks pass a building and recalls a incident that happened late night as he was walking past the neighborhood. He recalls that a very despised man was crashed into a young girl and tried to run away, but Enfield grabbed him by his collar and took him back to the angry crowd. They wanted to kill him, but he offers a big check to them. As Enfield saw the name on the check, he let him go and went on with his night. When, Enfield reveals the name of the accused’s name, Hyde to Utterson, he is taken into utter shock. After he came back from his walk, Utterson studies the will that he drew up for his client/friend, Dr. Jekyll. It states that if Jekyll goes missing or dies, all of his property will be given to Edward Hyde. Utterson feels that Hyde is probably holding something over his friend, after hearing about his behavior. At night, he is tormented with nightmares of a faceless man running after a small kid and he is standing besides Jekyll’s bed, giving him orders. Soon after, Utterson walks past the same neighborhood Enfield had described to him, hoping to cross paths with Hyde. When Hyde finally appears, Utterson introduces himself and as he gets a clear picture of his face, he is utterly taken back with his not so appealing features. He could not describe what was so ugly about him. Hyde tells him where he lives, and Utterson took this as a sign to Jekyll’s death. After paying visit to him, Utterson runs down to Jekyll’s house and realizes that Hyde’s building is connected to Jekyll’s townhouse. He runs into Jekyll’s butler, Poole, who reveals that every servant has to obey Hyde’s orders. A couple of weeks later, when Utterson is invited to Jekyll’s house, where he finally comes out clean about the will and says that he does not trust Hyde. However, Jekyll makes him promise to carry out the will if anything happens to him.
One year later, a maid sitting by window witness a murder across the street, by a man who she recognized as Mr. Hyde. She describes that he beat the man to death with a stick. Police finds a letter with Utterson’s address on the death body. Utterson takes the police to the place, where Hyde used to stay, where he ponders upon the fact that a man like him is heir of Jekyll’s property. As they look around, police find a burned check book and a murder weapon. They hope that Hyde will eventually withdraw some money and they will have to wait for that moment. Utterson visits Jekyll once again and Jekyll discloses that Hyde and him and are no longer friends. He then shows him a letter that Hyde wrote to him stating that he has hope to escape and he does not feel worthy of his Jekll’s fortunes. Utterson takes the letter with him, when one again he runs into Poole, who disclaims that no letter was ever delivered to Jekyll. Finally, Utterson consults with his clerk, Mr. Guest, a handwriting expert. He discloses that the writing on the letter matches with the writing of Jekyll’s.
The theme of Good vs. Evil quickly changes as we come to the end of chapter 5. From the beginning, we have seen Hyde as the Evil man, beating up a little girl, his ugly face symbolizing the darkness he possess and spreads around the entire London. However, we realize that Jekyll is forged a letter for a murder. Why is that? We always focus on the outer appearance of the person and be ignorant of how a person is from inside. The appearance is also another major part of the story.
We can compare this piece of literature with Frankenstein’s novel Monster, which also depicts the story of a horrified ugly looking monster. Dr. Frankenstein and Dr. Jekyll are scientists in their respective tales. They both consisted of an individual that they obsessed about and played an important part in the character. Frankenstein was passionate with “creature”, whereas Jekyll with Hyde. Both novels consisted of a laboratory that plays an important role in the literatures. Frankenstein creates a monster that he despises of, whereas Jekyll’s laboratory is connected with Hyde’s building, who also has the keys. Both tales pick children as their first victims, who is murdered by their obsessions. Most importantly, they are both isolated from the society.
Discussion questions
- what kind of a relationship does Hyde and Dr. Jekyll?
- Why is this literature focusing more on the appearance of the individuals?
- why is there a connection between Hyde’s building and Jekyll’s building?